The Supreme Court has taken a serious view of the violence and intimidation faced by seven judicial officers, including three women officers, who are deployed to adjudicate claims in the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process in West Bengal’s Malda district.
Describing the incident as a brazen and deliberate attempt to obstruct the administration of justice, a bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant expressed concern that despite prior intimation, state authorities did not act promptly, leaving the judicial officers without protection, food, or water for several hours, news agency ANI reported.
The apex court has issued show-cause notices to senior state officials, including the chief secretary, home secretary, and director general of police, over their inaction.
It also directed the ECI to requisition and deploy adequate Central forces to ensure the safety of judicial officers and the smooth conduct of the SIR adjudication process. Further, it mandated strict security arrangements at all venues, restricted public entry, and ordered an immediate assessment of any threat perceptions faced by the officers or their families, ANI reported. Compliance reports have been sought, and officials have been directed to remain virtually present at the next hearing.
“We are extremely disappointed to note these developments. Our previous order clearly reflects that judicial officers, who are entrusted with adjudicating the SIR process, must be allowed to perform their duties without fear or obstruction. The incident that took place is brazen and strikes at the very root of the rule of law. It amounts to a direct challenge to the authority of the Court. This was not a spontaneous act but appears to be a well-planned and deliberate attempt to demoralise judicial officers and obstruct the ongoing process of adjudication of objections. We will not permit any individual or group to take the law into their own hands or to create psychological fear in the minds of judicial officers,” the court stated.
SC terms incident criminal contempt, raps WB officials
Further slamming the state authorities, the court noted, “This conduct undoubtedly amounts to criminal contempt of court. It also exposes the failure of the State administration. The conduct of the Chief Secretary, Home Secretary, Director General of Police, Collector, and Superintendent of Police is highly deplorable. Accordingly, we issue show-cause notices to them as to why effective measures were not taken. The Election Commission of India (ECI) is directed to seek the deployment of central forces to protect the judicial officers. Taking cognisance of yesterday’s incident, we further direct that no obstruction or impediment shall be caused to the ongoing adjudication process. We reiterate that this Court shall ensure that the life, property, and family members of the judicial officers are duly protected.”
Taking a serious view of the matter, the Court issued certain interim directions to ensure the protection of judicial officers performing SIR duties: “The ECI is directed to requisition adequate central forces and deploy them at all locations where judicial officers are conducting SIR adjudication. Adequate security must also be provided at hotels, guest houses, and other places where these officers are currently staying. If any judicial officer or their family members have apprehensions or threat perceptions, the same shall be immediately assessed and appropriate action taken.”
It further stated that all necessary measures to ensure safety and smooth functioning shall be undertaken by the ECI in coordination with the state government.
“The Chief Secretary, Home Secretary, and DGP are jointly directed to ensure that not more than 3–5 persons are allowed to enter the premises at a time for filing objections. At no venue where SIR adjudication is ongoing shall more than five persons be permitted entry at any given time. The Chief Secretary and DGP shall file a compliance report before the Court,” it ordered.
The collector, chief secretary, dgp, district magistrate, and ssp have also been directed to show cause as to why appropriate action should not be taken against them in light of the letter received from the Chief Justice of the high court, ANI reported. They have further been directed to remain present (virtually) on April 6, the next date of hearing, it said.
(With ANI inputs)
